Home > Dismantling the 1+1+1 Script
The Baby God
Christian insists that Jesus was the son of God, but that he and God are one and the same.
Inform the Christian: “Cows have calves; little cows. Cats have kittens; little cats.
Humans have children; little humans. When God has a son, what is he? A little God? IF so, you have two Gods.”
The "Baby God" argument fails because it forces a biological definition onto a theological title.
The title "Son" describes shared nature, not physical reproduction.
The Dawah script uses animal analogies (cows, cats) to describe God. This is a "category error" because God is Spirit, not a biological organism. In Hebrew and Arabic thought, "Son of X" often means "having the qualities of X."
A human's son is 100% human. Therefore, God’s "Son" (His Word) is 100% God.
This isn't a "little God" (as if God divided Himself); it is the eternal expression of the one God.
This verse clarifies that the Son is the perfect "mirror image" of God's essence, not a separate, smaller deity.
Hebrews 1:3:
"He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power."This passage establishes that the Word (Jesus) existed eternally with God, meaning there was never a time when the "Son" was "born" in a biological sense.
John 1:1
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
| Argument | Islamic Dawah | Christian View |
|---|---|---|
| "Son" Definition | Biological/Sexual (Begotten) | Relational/Nature (Eternal) |
| Analogy Used | Animals (Cows/Cats) | Light (Sun/Rays) or Mind (Thought/Word) |
| The "Second" God | Claims Jesus is a "little" second God. | Jesus is the same God revealed in flesh. |
| Logic | Mathematical Addition (1+1) | Ontological Unity (One Being) |
Christians use the Islamic concept of the Quran to expose the flaw:
Muslim answers to Christians:
Q. "Is the Quran 'Allah'?
A. No.Q. But is it the 'Uncreated Word of Allah'? A. Yes.
Q. Does having an uncreated Word make for 'two Gods' in Islam?
A. No!
If the Quran can be eternal and distinct from God's essence without creating a second God, then the Christian "Son" (the Word) does not violate monotheism.
The "Baby God" argument is simply a refusal to look past a literal, physical metaphor.