Surah 6:101 – “How can He have a son when He has no consort (companion)?”
Surah 19:21 – About Jesus: “It is easy for Me.”
Surah 66:12 (cf. Surah, 21:91) – Allah “blew into her [Mary] of Our Spirit” and she conceived.
P1. In 6:101 Allah argues that having a son is impossible for Him because He has no consort.
P2. In 19:21 and 66:12, Allah produces a “son” for Mary (Jesus) without any human consort and explicitly says this miraculous conception is “easy for Me.”
P3. If lack of a consort is truly a logical barrier to having a son, then Allah’s own claim that such a thing is “easy” (19:21) and His act of causing Mary to conceive by His Spirit (66:12) contradicts that reasoning.
P4. If such a conception is “easy” for Allah, then the argument “How can He have a son when He has no consort?” (6:101) is a bad argument, since His power clearly does not depend on having a consort.
C. Therefore, either Allah’s argument in 6:101 fails (undermining the Qur’an’s logic against divine sonship), or His claims of ease and power in 19:21/66:12 are not coherent; in both cases, the Qur’an’s reasoning about Allah’s “son” and Mary’s conception is internally inconsistent.
Then, by that logic, producing a “son” through Mary without a consort is not possible.
Yet 19:21 and 66:12 present exactly that kind of act and call it “easy for Me.”
Result: Allah’s own stated barrier (no consort) clashes with His own claimed act and power. Either 19:21/66:12 are impossible, or 6:101 gives a false/irrelevant reason.
Result: Either Mary effectively functions as the mother of a uniquely God-given son (making the “no consort” objection empty), or the Qur’an’s reasoning in 6:101 is logically flawed.
So:
If no consort really blocks sonship, the Mary/Jesus miracle and “it is easy for Me” claim crash.
If the Mary/Jesus miracle is truly easy, then 6:101’s “no consort” objection is nonsense.
Either way, the Qur’an’s logic about Allah’s sonship and Mary’s conception does not hold together.