Home > Other critiques of Christian doctrine - salvation
"Penal substitutionary atonement—the idea that Jesus (peace be upon him) died to take God's punishment for our sins—is evil and unfair. How can Allah, the Just, punish an innocent man for others' wrongs? The Qur'an says, ‘No bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another' (Surah Al-An'am, 6:164)—each person faces their own deeds. Killing Jesus to appease Allah twists justice into cruelty, making Him need blood to forgive.
Jesus brought guidance—‘We gave him the Injeel, in which was guidance and light' (Surah Al-Ma'idah, 5:46)—not a sacrifice. The Qur'an says, ‘The Messiah, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger' (Surah Al-Ma'idah, 5:75). Allah forgives directly: ‘Say, "O My servants who have transgressed… do not despair of the mercy of Allah"' (Surah Az-Zumar, 39:53). This Christian claim slanders Allah's mercy and Jesus' role, replacing fairness with a grim, unjust trade."
The doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA)—that Jesus Christ voluntarily took God's punishment for our sins—is not unjust, but the ultimate reconciliation of God's justice and love.
1. Justice is Satisfied by Self-Sacrifice
The claim that God punishes an innocent man is mistaken because of Jesus' divine identity.
2. Atonement Was Prophesied
This substitutionary death was foretold in the Old Testament as God's plan for achieving forgiveness:
PSA is essential to Christian theology, demonstrating that forgiveness is merciful but also costly, with Jesus paying the necessary price.